tnoonan@towntv.org   

Why names and affiliations are important.....

ORIGINS OF CREDIBILITY

Response to Letter from VOTF President  SEP. 9, 2002

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Opportunistic Redefinitions of Dogma begins with questionable scandals on faith and morals ..

James E. McGregor is a professor at Salem State College , Salem ,MA.

 

  The history of dissidence, disaffection, dis-information, proto-apostasy,  heresy, mini-heresy, creeping anti--clericism, etc.  has moved to the internet where education, prosyletising , virtuous behavior, and pop dogmatism move at the "speed of thought."   But, at, for, and by whose thought is the speed directed? 

  In the past change and misinformation could be blamed on either accident or error.  They could even be aimed at plagues, famines, and war.  The current situation could be traced to clerical indolence and dogmatic corruption.  But, educational policy errors and public policy contradictions have created a wedge wherein the educational investments of the past have been squandered by an inability to define and to utilize the current technology and its forums.   

  On the positive side, there is a corpus of catechetical experience and focus within the last two hundred years which is capable of being used within this area.  A functional vision of the Church in doctrine and in substance that informed Chesterton, Gilson, Maritain, Bellock, etc. still functions.  It was used by John Henry Cardinal Newman, John Paul II, and most seminaries until the mid-70's.    

  Appearing as a "corporate correction", it has quickly become an exercise in explorations in alternative doctrine and the beginning of a redefinition of "Faith and Morals".  This quote shows the appropriation of an institutional and official identity as well as an approach to clerical and pastoral functions: 

>    The National Catholic Community Foundation, which is managing the fund, has assured us that they will take steps to ensure that every donation is ultimately used to support Catholic programs and ministries.<

  But so very quickly it becomes whose "Catholic Charities" and whose other Catholic entities?  How far behind is the stick that goes with the carrot? 

>   Although Cardinal Law has said he will not accept the gift,

 we believe the heartfelt offerings of hundreds of Catholics will persuade him to reconsider. If not, these funds will be distributed to Catholic Charities or to other Catholic entities, such as schools and women religious.<

  The Catholic Church is already a "corporation" as a matter of legal necessity.  Does it have to submit to a "corporate takeover" de facto or

de jure to adjust a momentary PR problem in understanding the origin and history of the circumstances leading up to the "media crisis"?   The facts and the issues are still not defined in the instances of the "pedophile/ ephebophile" scandals which may be the last gasp of the 60's sexual revolution.   

  The research and conclusions of Dr. Judith Reismann into the bizarre and abusive perversions of science, psychology, and psychiatry in the work of Alfred Kinsey are of equal or greater magnitude to the current "crisis" in the clergy.  Ironically, and emphatically, that this amount of scandal and outrage was not displayed to the American Psychological Association or the American Psychiatric Association over Kinsey's, Money's and the Institute's aberrations is important.  Were the "ephebophile-clergy" issue genuine within the public awareness, then this scandal would hold equal emphasis.   

  A society that eroticizes its youth, prostitutes its leaders, redefines deviancy, rationalizes truth, politicizes duty and bowdlerizes  integrity loses much of its indignation and credibility when it attempts to utilize "catholic charity" for purposes other than helping those in need.    

  Those in need would seem to be not the "charity" but those seeking a redefinition of the term "Catholic", as it is currently defined.  The meaning, extension and application of the word "Catholic" in Doctrine, Faith and Morals is the real result of VOTF.  

  Moreover, this would be even more true  if the leaders and supporters do not realize, recognize, and assent to this!  But, for the rest of us it is important that we look at the OTHER affiliations, agendas and causes espoused by the supporters of the agenda and leadership of VOTF. 

Whose voice and whose faithful are involved within the organization?      

 

James E. McGregor

Salem State College

 

Comments@FaithfulVoice.com

 

Return to FaithfulVoice.com main page

 

Return to Archive index page