Yoga is incompatible with Catholicism Father John Hardon

“Inner” Hinduism professes pantheism, which denies that there is only one infinite Being who created the world out of nothing.

 

Yoga is incompatible with Catholicism because the best known practice of Hindu spirituality is Yoga. “Inner” Hinduism professes pantheism, which denies that there is only one infinite Being who created the world out of nothing. This pantheistic Hinduism says to the multitude of uncultured believers who follow the ways of the gods that they will receive the reward of the gods. They will have brief tastes of heaven between successive rebirths on earth. But they will never be delivered from the “wheel of existence” with its illusory lives and deaths until they realize that only “God” exists and all else is illusion (Maya). To achieve this liberation the principal way is by means of concentration and self control (yoga).

 

Indian spirituality is perhaps best known by the practice of yoga, derived from the root yuj to unite or yoke, which in context means union with the Absolute. Numerous stages are distinguished in the upward progress toward the supreme end of identification: by means of knowledge with the deity; the practice of moral virtues and observance of ethical rules; bodily postures; control of internal and external senses; concentration of memory and meditation–finally terminating in total absorption (samadhi), “when the seer stands in his own nature.”

 

Although the psychic element is far more important in yoga than the body, the latter is more characteristic of this method of Hindu liberation. Its purpose is to secure the best disposition of body for the purpose of meditation. The practice begins with a simple device for deep and slow breathing.

 

Stopping the right nostril with the thumb, through the left nostril fill in air, according to capacity. Then without any interval, throw the air out through the right nostril, eject through the left, according to capacity. Practicing this three or five times at four hours of the day, before dawn, during midday, in the evening, and at midnight, in fifteen days or a month purity of the nerves is attained.

 

After such preliminary exercises, more complicated practices are undertaken, but not without the guidance of a professional yogin, called guru. The meditative phase begins with fixing the mind on one object, which may be anything whatsoever, “the sphere of the navel, the lotus of the heart, the light of the brain, the tip of the nose, the tip of the tongue, and such like parts of the body” or also “God”, who on Hindu terms is the only real being who exists.

 

Gradually by sheer concentration of attention; the mind reaches a state of trance, where all mental activity stops and the consciousness rests in itself. The state of samadhi is the culmination of yoga and beyond it lies release. The life of the soul is not destroyed but is reduced to its “unconscious and permanent essence.”

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

 

Hardon, John A. “Ask Father Hardon.” The Catholic Faith 4, no. 2 (March/April 1998): 54-55.

 

Reprinted by permission of The Catholic Faith. The Catholic Faith is published bi-monthly and may be ordered from Ignatius Press, P.O. Box 591090, San Francisco, CA 94159-1090. 1-800-651-1531.

 

Comments@FaithfulVoice.com

 

 

THE BASIC CONFLICT BETWEEN MAHARISHI AND CHRISTIANITY

 

Following is the 1984 Pastoral statement of His Eminence Jaime Cardinal

Sin, Archbishop of Manila, on certain doctrinal aspects of the Maharishi

Technology of the Unified Field, held after consultation with theological

experts.

 

The Maharishi's doctrine and teaching on (1) God, (2) man, (3) the way to

go to God, (4) pain and suffering, and (5) sin is in open contradiction to

Christian Doctrine.

 

1. The "God" of the Maharishi is impersonal, as opposed to the God

manifested in Christian revelation where God is a personal God who loves

each human person in an intimate way.

 

     By denying the Creator as Supreme and teaching that "All is

     One," Maharishi removes the distinction between the Creator and

     the creature.  This directly leads to, or is an equivalent form

     of, pantheism.

 

     The "mantras" given to the followers of the Maharishi have been

     discovered to be invocations, in most of the cases, to deities

     of the Hindu pantheon, thus in a real sense denying the oneness

     of God and fostering polytheism.

 

2. Man is considered capable of attaining unlimited perfection, of being

totally liberated from all pain and suffering through the instrumentality

of Transcendental Meditation practiced in the Maharishi way. Similarly

through this, TM, man can find solution to all human problems ranging from

control of the elements to the attainment of indestructibility and

immortality.

 

     Two flaws, among others, appear clearly in this doctrine: (a) It

     does not accept the immortality of the soul, nor life beyond, as

     belonging to the nature of the soul; (b) ignores completely the

     existence of original sin, a Christian dogma, and the

     consequences for the realities of life.

 

3. The way to God is placed by Maharishi in TM as understood by him, his

books, and his followers, and it is placed on TM as the exclusive way to

God.

 

     Two flaws, again, are hidden in these affirmations: (a) the

     abuse of the term TM which has been appropriated by them as if

     theirs was "the" TM par excellence, the only authentic one

     (there is Christian mysticism, even authors speak of Hindu and

     Buddhist mysticism, and certainly there is also the well-known

     za-zen method of meditation); and (b) the way to God in the

     present economy for all is the way of the Cross as long as we

     are pilgrims, as explicitly preached by Christ himself, accepted

     in Christian doctrine and life. The heroism of Christian

     faithful suffering with the greatest courage and dignity appears

     to be absent in the Maharishi way to God.

 

4. Implicit in the Maharishi approach to the problem of pain and suffering

is the rejection of the redemptive value of suffering and of the existence

of Christ as the Redeemer. In fact, Maharishi in his book, Meditations of

Maharishi Mahesh Yogi (New York, Bantam Books, 1968, p.23), writes

explicitly: "I don't think Christ ever suffered or Christ could suffer."

(This statement has been repeated in many places by the Maharishi

followers.)

 

5. Sin. Maharishi tries to ignore the existence of sin. In this, Maharishi

follows the Vedic doctrine that regards sin as a bodily matter and has

nothing to do with the spirit or soul of man. The whole concept of "sin,"

if implicitly accepted, is considered as something external and

legalistic. The real sense of freedom and responsibility is absent, and

the "effects" of sin are the object of rituals, mantras, and TM. There is

no interior conversion, but a rather manipulative use of TM to attain

liberations.

 

     At the basis of this concept and approach is the concept of God,

     man, the way to God, pain and suffering, described above. From

     this point of view, one cannot be a Christian and a Maharishi.

 

6. As for TM, it may be considered as doctrine (content) or as technique

(method). From this point of view of doctrine it is not acceptable to a

Catholic, or a Christian at that. As for TM as technique, in the way the

Maharishi group presents it, it is not acceptable either because of its

intrinsic connections with the doctrine (cf. "mantras" and 1 and 2 above).

 

     This kind of TM is to be distinguished from various forms of

     prayer proper to the Oriental religious attitudes, some of which

     may be acceptable, and even beneficial, if properly scrutinized

     and used. TM, however, as proposed by Maharishi and as the

     end-result looked at by the Maharishi doctrine and followers,

     is, to say the least, quite risky. It becomes not a remedy but

     an escape. Its unavoidable result, within the Maharishi doctrine

     context, is the desensitization of conscience by trying to

     relieve not the guilt and the real disorder but only its

     symptoms and its accompanying restlessness.

  

 

     This document was taken from "Todays Destructive Cults and

     Movements," by Rev.  Lawrence J. Gesy, available from Our Sunday

     Visitor Press, 200 Noll Plaza, Huntington, IN 46750.

 

   -------------------------------------------------------------------

   The electronic form of this document is copyrighted.

   Copyright (c) Trinity Communications 1994.

   Provided courtesy of:

 

        The Catholic Resource Network

        Trinity Communications

        PO Box 3610

        Manassas, VA 22110

        Voice: 703-791-2576

        Fax: 703-791-4250

        Data: 703-791-4336

 

   The Catholic Resource Network is a Catholic online information and

   service system. To browse CRNET or join, set your modem to 8 data

   bits, 1 stop bit and no parity, and call 1-703-791-4336.

   -------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments@FaithfulVoice.com

 

Return to main page